Hyper V vs VMware: Which Is Best? Complete Comparison Platforms
Summary: In this article, you will learn Hyper V vs VMware and which is best for you and complete comparison of platforms.
virtualization has long since become a valuable part of modern-day businesses. The fame of virtualization technology is attributable to the long list of benefits it provides, including flexibility, cost-efficiency, reliability, on-demand scalability, and portability. virtually, hardware virtualization is made believable with the use of virtualization platforms, which help us to manage workloads in a virtual environment.
virtualization remains one of the most and hottest trends in business IT. many businesses have over 75% of server workloads virtualized. Whether your organization has already invested heavily within the cloud or is considering a first-time migration, it is critical to think about the role of a hypervisor in your overall experience.
A hypervisor is a firmware, computer software, or hardware that makes and runs virtual machines. The hypervisor presents virtual or guest operating systems to virtual machines and manages the execution of those virtual operative platforms, which may contain a variety of operating systems. The right hypervisor can ensure easy use, flexible resource allocation, and minimal disruption to each of the operating systems in use.
Furthermore, currently, there are two general players who dominate the virtualization market – such as Hyper-V vs VMware. This article post highlights the main Hyper-V vs VMware differences and helps you determine which platform is best for you.
What Is Hyper-V?
Microsoft Hyper-V is a native hypervisor that has been an optional component or element in Windows Server products since Windows Server 2008. furthermore, Hyper-V is also found within the x64-bit Professional (pro) and Enterprise editions of Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and also in Windows 10. There’s also a standalone Hyper-V Server with a limited function set that Microsoft makes accessible for free.
Hyper-V is a type-1, native hypervisor designed by Microsoft, which permits creating and managing multiple virtualized versions of a computer, referred to as virtual machines (VMs). Furthermore, Hyper-V provides a virtualization platform on that you’ll build IT infrastructure of any level of complexity. Each virtual machine (VM), during this case, is running in its own isolated space, without interfering with the processes in other VMs.
In a Hyper-V infrastructure, the host OS where Hyper-V is installed becomes a parent VM, and guest VMs installed with alternative operating systems are treated as kid VMs. Although the parent VM and guest VMs basically share equivalent resources on the server machine, the parent VM takes care of allocating the resources needed by the guest VMs. furthermore, It used a VMBus which runs from the parent VM’s Virtualization Service Provider to the guest VMs’ Virtualization Service Client. this work is performed behind the scenes and without any management required on both the side of the parent and guest VMs.
Hyper-V saves guest VMs to a virtual hard disk file and uses a high-level communication protocol called Enlightened I/O to access the physical hardware’s processing, networking, storage, graphics components, and among others. Enlightened I/O bypasses any device emulation layer and allows direct access to VMBus. furthermore, aside from Windows operating systems, Linux devices with kernels based on versions 3.4 and above, as well as FreeBSD, also support Enlightened I/O, allowing them to run faster on Hyper-V. Operating systems that do not support Enlightened I/O run on a slower emulation layer.
Other Notable Hyper-V Features Include:
Backup and disaster recovery— Hyper-V can buildup backup copies of VMs and store them in different locations for later retrieval just in case of disaster. It also offers two backup strategies, one using saved states and therefore the other using Volume Shadow Copy Service or Volume Snapshot Service (VSS), as it is also known.
Portability— moving a VM somewhere else is easier since Hyper-V storage migration supports live migration and export/import
Remote connectivity— Hyper-V has a remote connection tool that supports both Linux and Windows. called as Virtual Machine Connection, this tool options or features console access that permits you to see the events in the guest VM even when it’s in an unbooted state.
Security— Hyper-V features Secure Boot, serving to defend virtual machines and their data from malware and other forms of unauthorized access.
What Is VMware?
As you know that VMware vSphere is a server virtualization platform created by VMware. basically, vSphere encompasses a group or a set of virtualization products, which include the ESXi hypervisor, VMware Workstation, vCenter, vSphere Client, and others. All of these products combined constitute the VMware infrastructure, which allows centralized management of the created virtual environment.
VMware vSphere is a virtualization platform that’s not like Hyper-V since it comprises a suite of virtualization products. It includes the VMware ESXi hypervisor, a type-1 hypervisor that approximates Hyper-V’s capabilities. With its latest iteration, vSphere 7, the platform will currently handle Kubernetes workloads out of the box, creating it ideal to be used in development environments.
In terms of the hypervisor component of VMware ESXi, vSphere 7, is able to access the physical hardware’s computing resources directly and share them among the VMs in the system. ESXi VMs run on a high-performance cluster file system called Virtual Machine File System.
Previous iterations of the hypervisor utilize a Linux operating system kernel, but that has been dropped. The most recent ESXi version currently runs on a microkernel, called the VMkernel, that uses the Linux emulation layer to host the hardware and guest VMs, and connects on to processors and RAM.
For the other hardware elements or components, including networking and storage, ESXi uses modules, which are linked via another module, VMKlinux, that itself is derived from the Linux module interface. furthermore, some of the other modules are also derived from completely different Linux kernel modules.
Other VMware vSphere components and features include:
VMware Virtual SMP— it allows the virtual machines to use more than one physical processor at the same time or simultaneously.
vMotion— allows live migration of virtual machines even whereas they’re running.
VCenter Server— It is a management tool for ESXi that acts as the controller for data center services.
Storage vMotion— it allows the migration of virtual disks or configuration files.
vSphere High Availability— it allows using other available servers to restart failed VMs.
VMware vSphere Client— an HTML5 browser-based interface for connecting remotely to VCenter.
VMware vSphere Distributed Switch— it is a virtual switch that is used for connecting to multiple hosts.
VMware vSphere Software Development Kit— it provides users with application programming interfaces (APIs) that enable or allow access to some vSphere components.
Fault Tolerance— ensures continuous availability by creating copies of selected workloads on completely different servers.
How Do Compare Strengths and Weakness between Hyper V vs VMware?
VMWare and Hyper-V have their own advantages (strengths) and disadvantages (weaknesses). Therefore, when choosing between the two, it boils all the way down to that of the two that meet your own requirements.Both VMware and Hyper-V have each equally up to the task and own management tools, furthermore, In this aspect, the choice becomes a personal preference.
Therefore, in terms of storage deployment, VMware’s Virtual Machine File System (VMFS) holds a slight edge over Hyper-V’s ReFS, or Resilient File System, particularly when it comes to clustering. furthermore, while both have almost similar clustering capabilities, Hyper-V’s Cluster Shared Volume is more difficult and complex to use than the VMware equivalent.
Both platforms also boast snapshot technology, which allows or permits point-in-time copies of VMs and their data to prevent data loss. However, Hyper-V’s snapshots edge out VMware’s, as it can run snapshots in production and its persistent checkpoints can be exported to different or other locations. Moreover, Hyper-V also allows sixty-four (64) snapshots per VM, compared to just thirty-two (32) allowed by VMware.
VMware and Hyper-V additionally implement memory management techniques to make sure or ensure that RAM use in VMs is optimized. whereas VMware implements a variety of techniques like memory compression, transparent page sharing, and oversubscription/overcommit, Hyper-V sticks with just one—Dynamic Memory. This reliance on a single memory management technique works out in Hyper-V’s favor—it’s easier however better than the complex memory management in VMware.
For security, while VMware implements data encryption at rest & in motion, and even throughout workload migration, Hyper-V security is managed via Active Directory. Furthermore, the latter also has other security components that are far more extensive than VMware’s.
VMware supports more operating systems (OS), including Linux, Windows, Unix, and macOS. and whereas, Hyper-V support is limited to Windows plus a few more, including FreeBSD and Linux. If you need broader support, particularly for older operating systems, VMware is a good choice. If you operate mostly Windows VMs, then Hyper-V is a appropriate alternative.
Therefore, when it comes to scalability, there’s no clear winner, with some features or options in favor of VMware and Hyper-V prevailing in others. as an example, while VMware can use more logical CPUs and virtual CPUs per host, Hyper-V can accommodate a lot of physical memory per host and VM. Plus it can handle a lot of virtual CPUs per VM.
Finally, pricing for the 2 platforms varies widely, it is depending on the edition. Costs also cannot be compared with ease since they’re computed differently. Therefore, VMware charges per processor, but Hyper-V’s pricing is based on the number of cores on the host. For larger enterprises, VMware’s pricing structure looks ideal; smaller organizations, whereas, might find Hyper-V more to their liking.
Parallels RAS Supports Hosts Created with Hyper V vs VMware
Parallels® (RAS) Remote Application Server supports VMware vSphere and Hyper-V, similarly as various other types one(1) and type two(2) hypervisors, including Microsoft Hyper-V, Scale Computing HC3, Nutanix Acropolis, and VMware ESXi.
Setup and configuration of VMware vSphere and Hyper-V hosts in Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is straightforward. VMware needs more steps, which isn’t surprising as long as that you must also set up ESXi Host and VMware vCenter. Hyper-V setup is easy since you only require to set up the Hyper-V host.
After the host configuration and setup, you just need to set up only an agent on the guest VMs to manage guests and publish their resources. Guest pools and templates are also simple to set up, and updating and managing templates are performed over a single pane of glass.
Regardless of the platform, you decide on, Parallels RAS allows the fast creation of an affordable virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) with improved security and centralized desktop management capabilities.
Comparing Hyper-V vs VMware
Hyper-V and VMware have a set of unique features that differentiate them from one another. Moreover, each virtualization platform entails a number of advantages and disadvantages to consider when deciding between the two. The following excerpt will outline the main components that both platforms offer as well as the differences and similarities between Hyper-V and VMware.
Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere
Microsoft Hyper-V exists in two modes. The two variants are fairly similar in structure and perform the same functions:
As the Hyper-V role, which is an in-built Windows Server feature that can be enabled by a server administrator.
As a stand-alone Microsoft product (also called as Hyper-V Server), with limited functionality and Hyper-V management components.
The architecture of Hyper-V is predicated upon micro-kernelized hypervisors, which means that a host server provides direct access to hardware and computing resources (virtualization stack). Hyper-V permits you to isolate VMs into logical units together with operational systems and applications. Partitions are divided into the parent & child partitions. Each Hyper-V environment can have only 1 parent partition, that should run a supported version of Windows Server.
The parent partition will produce multiple kid partitions for hosting guest OSes. Child partitions can not directly access hardware resources however they can present a virtual view of the resources in the form or type of virtual devices. The communication b/w the parent and the child partitions are conducted via the VMBus, which allows you to manage the requests directed to virtual devices. The parent partition also includes a VSP (Virtualization Service Provider), that enables the connection to the VMBus for managing device access requests from child partitions.
The earlier version of VMware ESXi – VMware ESX – ran on a Linux kernel, which acted as the primary VM. Later, the ESXi hypervisor was introduced to minimize the overhead imposed by VMware ESX. VMware ESXi needs a minimum amount of hardware resources and enables or allows a small footprint of 70 MB. The high performance of ESXi is ensured by VMkernel, which forms the basis of the virtualization process. VMkernel runs directly on hosts and provides the connection between VMs and the physical hardware.
In order to manage the VMware virtualization platform, other components of vSphere, such as VMware vSphere Client or VMware vCenter Server, are provided. They function because of the management tools used for running ESXi hosts.
Hyper-V can host 2 types of OSes in child partitions: enlightened and unenlightened. The difference is that the enlightened child partition has Hyper-V integration elements and a Virtualization Service Client, that allows you to avoid device emulation and enable direct communication with the virtualization layer. At constant time, the unenlightened child partition doesn’t have the same components and simply emulates software.
VMware vSphere is a virtualization platform consisting of multiple components or elements that require to be installed and set up. basically, vSphere is a suite of virtualization products, which, when combined, permit you to build a computing platform. At the core of VMware vSphere lies VMware ESXi, which is a type-one(type-1), native hypervisor used to directly manage host servers and run multiple guest VMs. VMware ESXi permits direct access to the physical machine’s computing resources, which are shared by the VMs running in the system.
vSphere VMFS vs. Microsoft ReFS
With virtualization, the software system is abstracted from the hardware and all the VM data is stored in a virtual disk file. during this case, a virtual disk file functions as the hard disk of a VM and is regarded as a complete VM. furthermore, both platforms are used virtual hard disks for storing information. The data inside the vSphere environment is stored in the virtual machine disk format, while Hyper-V applies the Virtual Hard Disk format.
Virtual disk files existing in the virtual environment (VE) are typically stored and organized via the file system. Both Microsoft and VMware have proposed their native file systems for managing the data on a storage device.
The equivalent to this solution in the Hyper-V environment is the Resilient File System, which was introduced as a built-in feature of Windows Server 2012. Resilient File System is based on its earlier file system – NTFS – and was designed to eliminate the problems existing in NTFS and address modern data storage requirements. Resilient File System (ReFS) permits users access to VM files directly from a host server. Resilient File System (ReFS) can detect and promptly fix data corruptions. This can be done online, thus inflicting no volume downtime. Moreover, through the new features of Block Cloning and Sparse Valid Data Length(VDL), the operations running in VMs can be considerably accelerated. However, when it comes to clustering, Hyper-V does not provide a similar level of flexibility. Even though Hyper-V includes Cluster Shared Volume, the use of this functionality is much more complex than the one in VMware VMFS.
VMware Virtual Machine File System is that the clustered file system used for storage virtualization of the data contained in a virtualized environment. Multiple VMs can at the same time access and use a single Virtual Machine File System volume as a virtualized storage, which helps to reduce management overhead and improve resource utilization. With Virtual Machine File System (VMFS), you can manage VMware ESXi hosts across the cluster, which means that you can add, migrate, or remove multiple hosts. Virtual Machine File System (VMFS) has the on-disk locking or protection feature which ensures that the data can be accessed only by one user or method at a time so as to avoid data corruption.
Snapshot technology permits you to capture a point-in-time copy of a VM and every one of the data that it contains. If the VM fails or a disaster strikes the production site, the VM can be recovered to the original state with the assistance of the saved snapshot. Snapshots in VMware and Hyper-V not only work differently however even have totally different names. VMware uses the term ‘snapshots,’ whereas in Hyper-V they’re known as ‘checkpoints.’
Administrators working in Hyper-V or VMware environment should be aware of how snapshot technology works therefore to improve memory space management.
The following differences between checkpoints and snapshots are represented in the table below:
Stored on the host server, however, you’ll be able to later export checkpoints to a different location
Stored as a set of files in the Identical directory as another file that comprises a virtual machine
64 snapshots per VM
32 snapshots per VM
Changed blocks are recognized in every file of the file system
Changed blocks are recognized on the file system level
Running snapshots in production is available or existing
Running snapshots in production is not available or existing
Note:Important Note: snapshots can not be used rather than backups because they are not appropriate for long-term storage and may be lost if the VM’s virtual disk is damaged.
VMware vCenter Server vs. System Centre Virtual Machine Manager
It is conjointly rather important to mention the management tools, that are essential for operating in any virtual environment, in the Hyper-V vs VMware comparison. VMware and Hyper-V are managed by VMware vCenter and SCVMM (Microsoft System Centre Virtual Machine Manager), respectively.
VMware vCenter Server is a centralized data management application that’s used to manage VMware vSphere environments and build virtualized cloud infrastructures. VMware vCenter Server is a virtual machine manager, that is installed on the primary server for watching the VMs running in the virtual platform. furthermore, the tool permits you to look and control all ESXi hosts and host clusters from a single console, so reducing the burden of management.
Microsoft System Centre Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) is a management tool which is designed by Microsoft for operating multiple VMs existing in an Identical environment. Microsoft System Centre Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) is available in two versions: such as an in-built feature of the Windows operating system or as a stand-alone product. System Centre Virtual Machine Manager allows you to create, control, and delete VMs. The tool manages the processes occurring in the VMs by providing access to necessary hardware resources, like as memory, drivers, storage, and others.
GUEST OPERATING SYSTEM SERVICES
VMware Tools vs. Microsoft Integration Services
Note: To ensure efficient performance within the virtual environment, both VMware and Hyper-V provide a set of system services and tools which can be easily installed.
With VMware vSphere, you can install VMware Tools, which is a set of utilities and drivers used for seamless integration between the host and the guest ESXi servers, and efficient management of the VM data. VMware Tools include VMware Tools Services, VMware Device Drivers, VMware User Process, and VMware Tools Control Panel. VMware Tools Control Panel provides a graphical overview of VMware tools and permits users to configure them. VMware Tools Services enables the communication between the host and the guest OSes. With VMware User Process, you can copy/paste text and drag/drop files between the host and guest OSes.
VMware Device Drivers provide a set of drivers for installation, which can enhance mouse operations, networking performance, and the quality of sound and graphics. Installing VMware Tools offers multiple benefits: enhanced graphics performance, high-level synchronization between the host and guest file systems, and shared access to files and folders within the virtual environment.
Hyper-V provides the chance to install Microsoft Integration Services (MIS), which helps in performing numerous tasks and solving reoccurring issues. The main application of Hyper-V Integration Services also called SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), is in data migration as it permits or enables data integration and workflow optimization.
Its component – the SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) Export/Import Wizard – allows users to create packages that move data from one point to another, without affecting its integrity. Moreover, you can easily edit and manage the created packages in the Business Intelligence Development Studio with the help of its user-friendly interface.
Another exclusive Hyper-V feature is the Server Integration Services Database Package (SSISDB) Upgrade Wizard. This feature enables the upgrading of a catalog database, that stores and monitors all database packages in the system. Upgrading the catalog database is important for avoiding any issues which might occur if the version in use is older than that of SQL Server.
Oversubscription vs. Dynamic Memory
Both VMware and Hyper-V apply a variety or range of memory-management techniques. there are some of the techniques used by VMware to achieve a high level of RAM optimization are produced below:
Therefore, memory compression is used as a more efficient and less expensive alternative to disk swapping. When there is little space left on RAM, virtual pages are compressed and made small enough so as to fit them in memory. the compressed files can be accessed quickly and will not interrupt the workflow. Memory compression is enabled by default.
VMware Overcommit/Oversubscription. This method allows you to assign more RAM resources than available on the physical host to the VMs running on its host. The system actively monitors the VMs and the amount of memory that they’re currently using With the Idle Memory Tax feature, the hypervisor can estimate the amount of idle memory and active memory utilized by each VM. VM memory that’s not in active use will then be ‘taxed’ and reassigned to other VMs which need it more.
The guest Ballooning is installed as part of VMware Tools. This method allows a VM of your choice to extract the unused memory from other VMs and distribute it to the ones that lack RAM resources.
Transparent Page Sharing. basically, this is a deduplication method used for memory management. When the CPU isn’t used by any program, this method or technique allows you to track the VM memory pages that are the same and then share them among other VMs. This way of the process, space being filled by redundant memory pages gets freed up.
VMware provides a large variety of memory management methods. furthermore, Hyper-V provides only one tool, known as Dynamic Memory, which functions in the same way as the VMware Oversubscription feature. Therefore, the dynamic memory permits you to set up a specific amount of memory, memory priority, and other memory optimization settings on the basis of which Hyper-V then defines how much memory should be allocated to a particular specific VM. Dynamic memory can be configured in Hyper-V Manager, where you can specify the following values: Startup RAM, Maximum RAM, Minimum RAM, Memory Weight, and Memory Buffer.
vMotion vs. Live Migration
Workload migration has long become a necessity when operating in a virtual environment. Therefore, Both VMware and Hyper-V have introduced their own tools that permit the migration of production workloads across the infrastructure. Thus, VMware vMotion and Hyper-V Live Migration should be considered as separate entities.
Hyper-V Live Migration is the migration tool designed for transferring a running VM or an application between physical hosts, without causing system downtime. However, the implementation of Live Migration is much more complex than that of vMotion. Before performing the workload migration, you need to set up Microsoft Failover Clustering on all physical hosts that will participate in the process and adjust network settings so as to ensure seamless data transfer.
VMware vMotion is a part of VMware vSphere which allows the migration of workloads between servers in almost real-time. the workload migration does not interfere with the processes in the virtual environment, and all applications can still be accessed. Thus, zero downtime is achieved and VM (virtual memory) productivity isn’t affected. Also, with the VMware vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler, you can schedule migrations to occur at a particular time, which permits you to automate workload migrations.
The scalability of the virtual infrastructure should always be considered by organizations when choosing a hypervisor. Due to the fact that the organization’s workload can either increase or decrease with time, it is important to be prepared for any scenario and identify the opportunities for scalability provided by hypervisors.
The table below outlines the Hyper-V vs VMware scalability differences
Hyper-V on Windows Server 2016
VMware vSphere 6.7
Virtual CPUs per VM
240 for generation 2 VMs
64 for generation 1 VMs
320 available to the host OS
Memory per VM
12 TB for generation 2 VMs
1 TB for generation 1 VMs
Maximum Virtual Disk Size
64 TB (VHDX format)
2040 GB (VHD format)
Number of Virtual SCSI disks
Maximum number of VMs per cluster
Maximum number of nodes
Virtual CPUs per Host
VMs per Host
As you’ll see, that there are few features in which Hyper-V exceeds VMware and vice versa. Therefore, when choosing between Hyper-V and VMware, consider your business requirement and priorities, the physical resources of your infrastructure, therefore the accessible budget.
Hyper-V and VMware provide a free version of their virtualization platforms for an opportunity to use. furthermore, you can see that how the product works and what kind of benefits it provides. However, the trial version of the product includes only the basic-level functionality, which means that you just won’t be able to check all of its elements.
It is difficult to compare the pricing policies of Hyper-V vs VMware because of the actual fact that VMware ESXi is licensed per socket (physical CPU), whereas Hyper-V has been licensed per core since 2016.
Microsoft’s licensing model calculates the cost price based on the number of physical cores on the host. furthermore, depending on how many hosts have the software installed, you can identify the total number of cores for which licenses are required. every license is a two-core pack.
the minimal number of cores that can be licensed is four, meaning that processors with one and two cores still would be assigned four cores.
furthermore, the VMware vSphere 6.7 is licensed based on a per-processor. each server CPU should be assigned at least 1(one) processor license key. notice here- VMware imposes no limits on the size of RAM and VMs running on the licensed processor and the number of CPUs
The table below shows the differences or variations in the pricing of Hyper-V vs VMware.
Windows Server Essentials (WSE)
Windows Server Standard (WSS)
Windows Server Datacenter (WSD)
VMware-vSphere Enterprise Plus
Approx. US $3,495
VMware-vSphere with Operations Management Enterprise Plus
Approx. US $4,525
Approx. US $4,595 with 1 year VMware AppDefense Subscription
A virtual environment can be rather delicate. Thus, it must important to be securely protected against any malevolent attacks or viruses. Both Hyper-V and VMware ensure secure security for your virtual environment with the help of tools and various services.
VMware vSphere 6.7 applies VM Encryption that is designed for data protection at rest and in motion and prevention of unauthorized access to the system. Therefore, data protection is guaranteed or bonded even during the workload migration. during this case, the feature of Encrypted vMotion is enabled, which allows you to safeguard data when it is moved between physical servers and even across a hybrid cloud environment.
Furthermore, Hyper-V functions as a Windows Server role, it can be managed via Active Directory. Hyper-V also provides a set of advanced security components or elements, like Host Guardian Service, Guarded Fabric, and Shielded VMs. Therefore, The Guarded Fabric is a data-protection method that lets you build a secure environment for VMs. A guarded fabric includes Host Guardian Service and several shielded VMs. HGS helps to observe the state of shielded VMs and defend the keys used for decrypting the VMs. If Host Guardian Service is not enabled, the shielded VM can’t be power-driven on and can stay encrypted.
The data protection system of Hyper-V is Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection, which allows detection of cyber-attacks and response to threats in advance with the help of machine learning, and Windows Defender Exploit Guard, which protects against ransomware attacks and reduces the attack surface of critical applications.
It is price noting that vSphere 6.7 introduced support for a good range of Hyper-V security parts released with Windows 2016 and Windows Server 10. Both Hyper-V and VMware have worked along to make sure the seamless integration for the VMs running on Windows OS in the vSphere environment.
Hyper V vs VMware Complexity Issues
The issue of complexity is somewhat subjective, particularly provided that there’s a learning curve related to both hypervisors. Even so, Microsoft Hyper-V is usually considered as being less complicated or complex and a lot of intuitive than vSphere. There are, however, a minimum of some people who claim to search the VMware platform easier to use. So it’s going to come down to the individual experience/taste of your admins.
Hyper V vs VMware: What’s the Conclusion?
operating and Building in an exceedingly virtual environment would be impossible without a reliable and efficient virtualization platform, like Hyper-V and VMware. Before deciding which platform to decide for conducting your business operations, consider the differences in Hyper-V and VMware management, scalability, licensing, architecture, and backup integration similar to what advantages each has.
Hyper V vs VMware conclusion, moreover, make sure that your virtualization platform is often seamlessly integrated with the data-protection solution that you simply use. Backup and Replication is reliable, cost-effective data-protection software and fast. Backup and Replication can be seamlessly integrated with VMware and Hyper-V environments, therefore permitting you to enjoy the benefits that both platforms provide to the fullest extent.